Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Touran might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 158 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |