Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Opel Zafira 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Zafira is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Zafira, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Zafira. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 23 cm shorter than the Opel Zafira, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 152 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 152 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | 710 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Opel Zafira has more luggage space (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Opel Zafira has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Opel Zafira, so Opel Zafira quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |