Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford S-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 34 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |