Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 28 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 158 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |