Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 22 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine Volkswagen Touran 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 158 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |