Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford Galaxy 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.2 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 38 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1710 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`940 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`298 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 642 kg | 846 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |