Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1440 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.86 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 25 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 23 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`159 | |
Safety: | |||
Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Caddy is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Caddy, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |