Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Verso, but torque is 110 NM more than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1696 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space (by 53 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |