Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 2 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 3.9 | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 35 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`046 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |