Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford S-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 33 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |