Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 55 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 105 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |