Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford C-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 105 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |