Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Dacia Lodgy 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 5 HP more power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Dacia Lodgy. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Lodgy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 207 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2617 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Dacia Lodgy has more luggage space (by 290 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Dacia Lodgy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`896 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Lodgy has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Dacia Lodgy has
| |