Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Dacia Dokker 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 37 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.5 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm longer than the Dacia Dokker, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 263 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`818 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |