Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs BMW 2 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 78 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 2 sērija 2018: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split equally between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1905 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 108 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW 2 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 2 series, so BMW 2 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |