Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008 | Used also on Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 39 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C4 Picasso has 147 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |