Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 143 HP | 85 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 170 - 270 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 8.6 - 14.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.9 | 5.1 - 8.6 | |
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 21 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 406 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 94 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`426 | ~ 1`959 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |