Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 143 HP | 105 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 270 NM | 152 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.9 | 5.4 - 8.6 | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 533 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1960 litres | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Picasso has 33 litres less trunk space than the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`426 | ~ 2`176 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |