Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 143 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 270 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.9 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 30 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Picasso has 354 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`426 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |