Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 143 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
Torque: | 170 - 270 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.9 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 19 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 550 litres | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 50 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`426 | ~ 1`267 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |