Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Citroen C4 Picasso is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Caddy has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 - 150 HP | 69 - 109 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 126 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.8 seconds | 13.3 - 20.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.9 | 6.0 - 8.3 | |
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Caddy. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.83 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 2`024 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |