Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 163 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.6 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.9 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 2063 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Grand Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 329 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`081 kg | ~ 2`136 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`561 kg | ~ 1`496 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 520 kg | ~ 640 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Renault Grand Scenic. Therefore, Renault Grand Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |