Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Honda FR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Citroen C4 Picasso is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda FR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 - 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 175 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.8 seconds | 10.1 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.9 | 6.3 - 8.1 | |
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda FR-V. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 19 cm longer than the Honda FR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 439 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1049 litres | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 61 litres more trunk space than the Honda FR-V. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda FR-V, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 2`042 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |