Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 156 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 151 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13.7 seconds | 10.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 4.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Picasso has 108 litres less trunk space than the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`932 | ~ 2`197 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |