Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Opel Zafira 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 156 HP | 115 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13.7 seconds | 9.8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 5.2 - 7.2 | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Zafira. On average, Citroen C4 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 23 cm shorter than the Opel Zafira, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 710 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
|
Opel Zafira has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Picasso has 173 litres less trunk space than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`932 | ~ 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |