Citroen C4 Cactus 2018 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Cactus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.57 m | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1189 litres | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus has 4 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |