Citroen C4 Cactus 2018 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Citroen C4 Cactus) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Kamiq) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 254 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, but torque is 54 NM more than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | no data | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
Citroen C4 Cactus is smaller. Citroen C4 Cactus is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Cactus has 42 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 18 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |