Citroen C4 Cactus 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Renault Kadjar 2018: Kadjar has an automatic four-wheel drive system with three modes: 2WD, AUTO and LOCK. In 2WD and AUTO modes, it`s a front-wheel drive vehicle under normal conditions. In AUTO mode, if wheel spin is detected, up to 50% of torque can be sent to the rear wheels. In LOCK mode, the center differential is engaged to provide a preset 50/50 power distribution between the front and rear axles. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is smaller. Citroen C4 Cactus is 32 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Cactus has 114 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 308 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 2`139 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |