Citroen C4 Cactus 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Cactus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.57 m | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Cactus has 107 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Cactus (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Cactus, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |