Citroen C4 Cactus 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1610 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is smaller. Citroen C4 Cactus is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1665 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C4 Cactus has 36 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. The Skoda Yeti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 495 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Citroen C4 Cactus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Yeti, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |