Citroen C3 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Citroen C3 and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Citroen C3 torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
By specification Citroen C3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Citroen C3 2016 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C3 and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
922 litres | no data | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Citroen C3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen C3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`620 | |
Safety: | |||
The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 13 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |