Citroen C3 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 engine produces 22 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C3 and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
922 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Citroen C3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen C3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |