Citroen C3 2002 vs Citroen C3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 108 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Citroen C3 2002 engine produces 24 HP more power than Citroen C3 2006, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Citroen C3 2006. Despite the higher power, Citroen C3 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
The Citroen C3 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 2002 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 2006, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 2002 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 2006. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
950 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C3 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C3 2002 and Citroen C3 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1150 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 2002 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 2006, which means Citroen C3 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`539 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
| |