Citroen C3 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Citroen C3
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP75 HP
Torque: 150 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.4 seconds13.6 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C3 engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.5
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1120 km on highway
950 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m3.90 m
Width: 1.67 m1.65 m
Height: 1.52 m1.46 m
Citroen C3 is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1150 litres975 litres
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 175 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5011`550
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Citroen C3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Citroen C3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv