Citroen C3 2002 vs Citroen C3 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Citroen C3 2002 and Citroen C3 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Citroen C3 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Citroen C3 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 2002 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 2002 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 2002 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 2005. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C3 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C3 2002 and Citroen C3 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1150 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`510 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |