Citroen C3 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C3 engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Citroen C3 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`632 | 1`674 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |