Citroen C3 2010 vs Mazda 2 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 156 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Citroen C3 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
Citroen C3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
Citroen C3 is larger. Citroen C3 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`579 | 1`460 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |