Citroen C3 2010 vs Mazda 2 2010

 
Citroen C3
2010 - 2013
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP102 HP
Torque: 156 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.4 seconds
Citroen C3 is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.8
Citroen C3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway890 km on highway
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.94 m3.92 m
Width: 1.73 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Citroen C3 is larger.
Citroen C3 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litresno data
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C3 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5791`460
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 34004400
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv