Citroen C3 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Citroen C3 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Citroen C3 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`612 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |