Citroen C3 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 engine produces 11 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Citroen C3 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`529 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |