Citroen C3 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 engine produces 35 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.2 | |
Citroen C3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
Citroen C3 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`564 | 1`674 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |