Citroen C3 2010 vs Peugeot 207 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 136 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Peugeot 207 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 engine produces 34 HP less power than Peugeot 207, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Peugeot 207. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1020 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3 Picasso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Peugeot 207 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
Citroen C3 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 207, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | 923 litres | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The Peugeot 207 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 77 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207, which means Citroen C3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`527 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |