Citroen C3 2013 vs Mazda 2 2010

 
Citroen C3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP102 HP
Torque: 156 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds11.9 seconds
Citroen C3 is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.3
Citroen C3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway810 km on highway
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.94 m3.92 m
Width: 1.73 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Citroen C3 is larger.
Citroen C3 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data787 litres
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C3 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6121`495
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 76003600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 2 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv