Citroen C3 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
Citroen C3 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 engine produces 22 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1280 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
Citroen C3 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C3 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Citroen C3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`511 | 1`510 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7800 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |