Citroen C3 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 - 110 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 94 - 200 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.1 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Citroen C3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen C3 is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1030 litres | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 120 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`502 | ~ 1`530 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |