Citroen C3 2002 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 110 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 200 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.1 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, a Citroen C3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen C3 is larger. Citroen C3 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C3 has 205 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Citroen C3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`502 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |