Citroen C3 2002 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 110 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 200 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.1 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
|
Citroen C3 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3 2005. On average, Citroen C3 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C3 2002 and Citroen C3 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 2002 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 2005, which means Citroen C3 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`502 | ~ 1`547 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
| |