Citroen C3 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C3
2005 - 2010
Ford Fiesta
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.61.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 61 - 110 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 94 - 260 NM106 - 204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 15.9 seconds8.4 - 17.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.24.3 - 7.4
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Citroen C3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m3.92 m
Width: 1.67 m1.68 m
Height: 1.52 m1.46 m
Citroen C3 is smaller, but higher.
Citroen C3 is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres284 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1150 litres947 litres
Citroen C3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The Ford Fiesta may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 203 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Citroen C3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`547~ 1`562
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 16001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.5/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv