Citroen C3 2005 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 - 110 HP | 60 - 197 HP | |
Torque: | 94 - 260 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | 6.9 - 15.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.2 | 4.3 - 8.4 | |
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Citroen C3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.94 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
Citroen C3 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1038 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 112 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`547 | ~ 1`653 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 6.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |