Citroen C3 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 120 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 270 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 18.1 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 6.9 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Citroen C3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Citroen C3 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
| Citroen C3 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`587 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |