Citroen C3 Picasso 2015 vs Opel Meriva 2014

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2015 - 2017
Opel Meriva
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP120 HP
Torque: 205 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds11 seconds
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Meriva, but torque is 5 NM more than Opel Meriva. Despite less power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.06.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1050 km on highway
720 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Citroen C3 Picasso 2015 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.29 m
Width: 1.77 m1.91 m
Height: 1.63 m1.62 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Meriva, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1506 litres1500 litres
Citroen C3 Picasso has 15 litres less trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 6 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.06 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.46 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`760 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Opel Meriva has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 40005000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Opel Meriva has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv